Stevens_Aussage+gegen+Aussage.jpg
 

Alexander Stevens, TESTIMONY AGAINST TESTIMONY

Piper - Nonfiction - Paperback - February 2020 - 256 pages

When it comes to litigation in court, it's often testimony against testimony. In that case, the rule is: in case of doubt for the accused. Right? Far from it, knows Alexander Stevens, specialist in criminal law. Because judges can also convict when there is no other evidence than the mere testimony of the opponent or a single witness. But how do judges decide such stalemates, especially when it comes to delicate cases like money and relationship disputes, violent and sexual crimes or even murder? By gut feeling?
Alexander Stevens describes his most exciting cases, where it was testimony against testimony, and presents the judicial result only at the end, so that you can think for yourself: How would I decide?


Rights sold to: Korea (BADA)